Of course. From the UK Telegraph:
Another staple of the classroom – white paper – has also been questioned by Anne O’Connor, an early years consultant who advises local authorities on equality and diversity.
Children should be provided with paper other than white to drawn on and paints and crayons should come in “the full range of flesh tones”, reflecting the diversity of the human race, according to the former teacher.
Finally, staff should be prepared to be economical with the truth when asked by pupils what their favourite colour is and, in the interests of good race relations, answer “black” or “brown”.
The measures, outlined in a series of guides in Nursery World magazine, are aimed at avoiding racial bias in toddlers as young as two.
According to the guides, very young children may begin to express negative and discriminatory views about skin colour and appearance that nursery staff must help them “unlearn”.
If children develop positive associations with dark colours, the greater the likelihood that the attitude will be generalised to people, it says.
Ah, but it’s across the pond. Where’d they get these crazy ideas anyway? Oh:
The advice is based on an “anti-bias” approach to education which developed in the United States as part of multiculturalism.
Fabulous. Now we export idiocy, too.
Will they ban the white crayons before or after the realization that white crayons mark on dark paper best? I’m sure that’s racist, too. Somehow.
Witches will wear pink. To avoid any negative connotations.
The Scarlet Letter has already been banned, I’m sure. The woods are too dark. Evil lurks in bright white spaces after all. Hell, better toss out all of Hawthorne. Dark and twisty soul, that man.
Oops. Pink and twisty, right?
It’s all a union plot to extract more money anyway. Colored paper costs more than white. Oh, I suppose “colored paper”–even if it refers to blue or red–is now a slur. Non-white.
Speaking of unions, money and terrible state-run education: Pundette, About that “investment” in government schools.