How will Obama not be able to count the jobless soliders he lays off in the unemployment rate? I’m sure he’ll find a way

Dude. Here comes the RIF.

Or “reduction in force” for those of you not as familiar with acronyms. We all knew what was coming with the current budgetary woes and a liberal in office hellbent on adding social spending while slashing the only spending the Constitution allows, but… I digress. From Bloomberg News:

The Defense Department may have to force soldiers, Marines or other members of the military out of the services for the first time since the aftermath of the Cold War to achieve the spending reductions in its budget proposal.

The Pentagon plans to cut 67,100 soldiers from active and reserve Army units and the Army National Guard in the five years starting Oct. 1, as well as 15,200 from the active and reserve ranks of the Marine Corps as part of an effort to save $487 billion over a decade, according to the budget sent to Congress today. The Navy and Air Force would lose fewer people — 8,600 and 1,700 respectively — because of their role in a strategic shift toward the Asia-Pacific region and the Middle East.

The military will first try buying out contracts or offering bonuses for people to leave, while working to keep those with valuable specialties such as cyber warfare and acquisitions, according to Travis Sharp, a fellow at the Center for a New American Security, a Washington policy group, who attended a Pentagon briefing for analysts last month.

“I was surprised that they were going to complete the reductions to the Army and the Marine Corps in just five years,” Sharp said in an interview before the budget was released. “What they told us is that they will try to use those types of positive incentives to the greatest extent possible, but that involuntary separations would probably still be necessary.”

The Pentagon has said it is aiming to a create a smaller, more agile military. Special operations forces, whose commandos killed Osama bin Laden last year, would be expanded.

The problem with that smaller, lighter force? It’s smaller and lighter and incapable of fighting a multi-front war. Special Operations Forces act as a force multiplier (meaning, yes, they do replace a larger force) but that’s meant to be used in the context of fighting through another force, i.e. helping a small indigenous force battle against a larger one. 

Read the rest. I wonder if Republicans will put up a real fight.



Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: